Skip to content

Reverse Proxy Exposure Strategies: AWS vs. Cloudflareยถ

Hereโ€™s a clear side-by-side comparison of the 3 options youโ€™re considering to securely expose your API to clients without static IPs, while maintaining full control, performance, and cost-efficiency.


๐Ÿงฎ TL;DR Summaryยถ

Feature / Option 1. Full AWS Setup 2. Cloudflare Tunnel + AWS EC2 3. Full Cloudflare (No EC2)
โœ… Security IP whitelisting, WAF, ALB mTLS/JWT via Cloudflare Access Same, fully Cloudflare-managed
โš™๏ธ Compute layer EC2 + ALB + NAT + ASG EC2 (t3.small) only None (cloudflared runs on your API)
๐Ÿ” Reverse Proxy control NGINX/HAProxy on EC2 NGINX optional, or just cloudflared No proxy; direct API via tunnel
๐Ÿ’ธ Monthly cost (est.) $200โ€“$300+ $25โ€“$50 $0โ€“$15
๐ŸŒ IP to whitelist EIP, NAT, ALB IPs EC2 EIP or NAT IP No need โ€” tunnel is outbound only
๐Ÿ“ฆ Data egress cost AWS charges ($0.09/GB) Free via Cloudflare CDN (optional) Free via Cloudflare CDN
๐Ÿง  Scaling Auto Scaling Group Manual or ASG on EC2 Native โ€” Cloudflare handles load
๐Ÿ”ง Maintenance High (infra + scaling) Low (1 small EC2, cloudflared) Very Low (run tunnel daemon only)
๐Ÿ” Access control IP-based Cloudflare Zero Trust policies Full Zero Trust, OAuth2, mTLS, etc.
๐Ÿ“Š Observability CloudWatch, custom logging NGINX + Cloudflare Cloudflare only (logs via LogPush)
๐Ÿš€ Deployment effort High Medium Very Low

๐Ÿงฑ 1. Full AWS Setupยถ

Description - ALB (TLS termination) โ†’ EC2 reverse proxies (NGINX/HAProxy) โ†’ Your internal API - Clients hit ALB. ALB connects to a fleet of EC2s via target group. - Requires whitelisting, NAT, health checks, scaling policies.

Pros - All AWS-native - Fine-grained control over networking - Mature and enterprise-ready

Cons - High cost (ALB, EC2 x3, NAT, egress) - Complex setup (Terraform, VPC, security groups) - Needs scaling logic and maintenance

Cost Breakdown (monthly)

Component Cost
ALB $25โ€“$40
EC2 x3 $90
NAT Gateway $40
EBS $3
Data egress $100+
Total $200โ€“$300+

๐ŸŒ 2. Cloudflare Tunnel + AWS EC2ยถ

Description - One EC2 (e.g., t3.small) running cloudflared (and optionally NGINX) - Tunnel forwards traffic from api.yourdomain.com to your internal API - Uses Cloudflare Zero Trust for access control

Pros - Much cheaper than full AWS - No need for ALB, NAT, or public IPs - Full control over access + logging - Works well with your existing Cloudflare plan

Cons - Still has an EC2 to manage - Not as elastic as ASG unless you add it

Cost Breakdown (monthly)

Component Cost
EC2 (1 node) $8โ€“$15
EBS (8 GB) $1
Cloudflared Free
Cloudflare WAF/Access Included
Data egress Free (via CF)
Total $25โ€“$50

โ˜๏ธ 3. Full Cloudflare (No EC2)ยถ

Description - Run cloudflared directly on your internal API server(s) - Cloudflare routes traffic securely from the public domain to your private backend - You skip all AWS infra (no EC2, ALB, NAT, EIP, etc.)

Pros - Zero AWS infra cost - End-to-end secured by Cloudflare - Most efficient + scalable - Still supports IP firewalling, mTLS, JWT, OAuth

Cons - Requires internal API servers to run cloudflared - Less separation of public/private layers - Might need HA setup for cloudflared (but it reconnects automatically)

Cost Breakdown (monthly)

Component Cost
cloudflared daemon Free
Cloudflare Access Included in paid plan
EC2 / ALB / NAT โŒ None
Data egress Free via CF
Total $0โ€“$15 (if you use your own infra)

๐ŸŽฏ Which Should You Choose?ยถ

Use Case Recommended Option
Max control, all-AWS infra, traditional setup Option 1: Full AWS
Lean AWS compute with strong Cloudflare control Option 2: Cloudflare + EC2
Lowest cost, zero AWS, pure Cloudflare edge exposure โœ… Option 3: Full Cloudflare

โœ… Final Thoughtsยถ

If youโ€™re OK with running cloudflared on your existing backend (or adding a lightweight sidecar), Option 3 gives you: - Fully secure access - Zero AWS infra cost - Cloudflare WAF, mTLS, JWT, SSO - Free global distribution

โšก Best value for 1000 RPS at low cost.